Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the party’s 2012 chances

By
Thursday, November 11, 2010 at 12:41 pm

Somos Republicans, a Latino group from the Southwest, wrote an open letter to the future House GOP leadership on Tuesday asking it to reconsider putting Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) in charge of the House subcommittee on immigration and Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas) in charge of the House Judiciary Committee.

The group argues that King and Smith’s anti-illegal immigration rhetoric and policy ideas, which include a proposal to end birthright citizenship for the American-born children of illegal immigrants, would alienate Latino voters and ruin the Republican party’s chances of defeating President Obama in 2012.

DeeDee Blase, the Somos Repubicans founder, explains:

Though it is constitutionally impossible that a mere Congressional “statute” will decide who gets to be a citizen, we believe that this insensitive and constant assailment on our Hispanic Community may push Hispanics further into the Independent, Libertarian or Democrat Party. Moreover, Hispanic voters were crucial in electing seven new Republican Hispanics to Congress and two new Republican Hispanic governors. However, Hispanics also vehemently and strongly rejected those Republicans that utilized harsh anti-immigrant rhetoric and opted for a Democrat, as it occurred in the West Coast, Colorado and Nevada.

It is our sincere belief that if representatives Smith and King were to become the Chairs of the House Judiciary and Subcommittee on Immigration, and if they indeed continue such insensitive rhetoric towards Hispanics, the conditions for a Republican presidential candidate to garner the necessary Electoral College Delegates to win the 2012 presidency will not be possible. Most of those states with the highest number of Electoral College delegates reside in highly populated Hispanic states such as California, Texas, Florida and New York.

It’s tough to pin down exactly what determines Latino voting patterns — given, of course, that Latinos aren’t a unified voting bloc. But polls indicate some broad trends among Latino voters, such as general support for immigration reform and opposition to immigration crackdowns like Arizona’s SB 1070.

More specifically, nearly 80 percent of Latino voters said they opposed changes to the Constitution to alter birthright citizenship laws, according to a Pew Hispanic Center survey released Oct. 28. Another 18 percent of Latinos overall said they supported changes to birthright citizenship. The number was slightly higher among Latino Republicans, 23 percent of whom said they supported changes to the 14th Amendment.

Beyond Latino voters, there is a near certainty that an effort to change birthright citizenship requirements would fail in the Senate or, at the very least, would be vetoed by Obama. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has expressed opposition to the idea.

Even if it were to pass, some Republicans have said ending birthright citizenship would hurt the GOP. After the 14th Amendment became a hot topic in the Senate in early August, two Bush administration officials called the idea of changing the amendment “offensive” and said doing so would harm the party’s legacy and turn off minorities.

Follow Elise Foley on Twitter


Comments

79 Comments

Anonymous
Comment posted November 11, 2010 @ 6:32 pm

If Latinos, whether Republican or Democrat, put their ethnic groups’ interests ahead of other Americans, what good is it for other Americans to pander to their desires to import more of their ethnicity into the US? That will just increase their political power and give them even more leverage to demand that even more members of their ethnicity be allowed into the US, at the expense of non-Latinos. Eventually we will be part of Latin America with all of its corruption, gangs, backward economies, etc.


Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the …
Pingback posted November 11, 2010 @ 1:43 pm

[...] by on November 11, 2010 Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.Powered by WP Greet Box The group argues that King and Smith’s anti-illegal immigration rhetoric and policy ideas, which include a proposal to end birthright citizenship for the American-born children of illegal immigrants, would alienate Latino voters and … View original here: Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Bon Jovi In Chicago At Soldier Field On Friday, July 30, 2010 | Rockstar Baby Strollers
Pingback posted November 11, 2010 @ 1:58 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Tweets that mention Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the party’s 2012 chances « The Washington Independent -- Topsy.com
Pingback posted November 11, 2010 @ 2:05 pm

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Elise Foley, WashIndependent. WashIndependent said: Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the party's 2012 chances http://bit.ly/drJS2R [...]


First GOP Presidential Debate Already Announced North Capitol Street
Pingback posted November 11, 2010 @ 3:13 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


iPad developer gets app rejected, call from Steve Jobs | Best Smartphone Blogging
Pingback posted November 11, 2010 @ 3:14 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … | Silcon Group
Pingback posted November 11, 2010 @ 3:23 pm

[...] See the rest here: Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Toys R Us Black Friday Ad 2010 – Indyposted | transformers 2 toys
Pingback posted November 11, 2010 @ 3:53 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


G20 struggles as Irish crisis hits market (Reuters) | Forex Trading Advice
Pingback posted November 11, 2010 @ 3:56 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Grammy Latino | Aquarian Advertising Network
Pingback posted November 11, 2010 @ 4:06 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Just Wondering.
Comment posted November 11, 2010 @ 9:08 pm

Interesting, does this ‘put their ethnic goups interests ahead of other Americans’ apply to the other minorities in the U.S.? Do you feel like you are part of Africa?


Harley Image And Swagger
Pingback posted November 11, 2010 @ 4:30 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … « Cool Immigration
Pingback posted November 11, 2010 @ 4:48 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … Comments [...]


ScottAZ
Comment posted November 11, 2010 @ 9:51 pm

Oh you mean like us Whites did in letting too many Eurpoeans in, including such undesirables as the Italian Mafia and Irish drunkards?


World Spinner
Trackback posted November 11, 2010 @ 6:14 pm

Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the ……

Here at World Spinner we are debating the same thing……


Grammys | Hot Music TV Network
Pingback posted November 11, 2010 @ 8:21 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Shiva
Comment posted November 12, 2010 @ 1:49 am

Republican latinos.

Oxymoron or not. You be the judge.


Shiva
Comment posted November 12, 2010 @ 1:52 am

Are you comparing Blacks who were born here to latinos that are far more recently citizens? Thats kind of like comparing a wooly mammoth to an elephant timewise


CeCe Winans “King of Kings” | Down King Comforter
Pingback posted November 11, 2010 @ 10:08 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Sam
Comment posted November 12, 2010 @ 5:00 am

Mexican immigrants don’t always think about the responsibilities and behavioral changes that U.S. residency involves. “We have to educate people … to respect the law.”

That respect doesn’t just start when an illegal immigrant takes up residence here. It begins at the border, and when an immigrant enters illegally, his reputation instantly becomes tainted in the eyes of many Americans, regardless of how the immigrant behaves as a resident.


Anonymous
Comment posted November 12, 2010 @ 5:44 am

Immigration was restricted in the US in the 1920s, of whites, by whites. Maybe you should learn about the history of this country? Maybe you should can the knee-jerk white-self hatred? There’s nothing more boring than a self-hating white liberal.


Write-In Review Continues in Alaska, Little Changes North Capitol Street
Pingback posted November 12, 2010 @ 12:54 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Restaurant group plans to fight fast-food restrictions in Los Angeles | Restaurant Dining Info Blog
Pingback posted November 12, 2010 @ 2:00 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the party’s 2012 chances &laquo… [...]


Mainstream Energy Investment Meets SRI | finacemanagement
Pingback posted November 12, 2010 @ 2:22 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the party’s 2012 chances &laquo… [...]


Sooc
Comment posted November 12, 2010 @ 7:52 am

I think that would’ve applied better if weren’t talking of economic migration – which it is about. Economic migration is universal, and is not about ‘law’. It’s about human nature to go where the ‘food’ is. Your case would’ve made more sense if most border-crossers were educated middle-class and up people that crossed BASED ON a disrespect for the law. Economic migrants don’t disrespect laws per se, but it’s more a side-effect of higher, more important needs. In addition, most everyone knows that many Americans gladly hire them once they’re in, and that millions of Americans take advantage of their cheaper services without saying anything. The only times something is being said, is when some demagogic right-wing asshole starts bashing them – then suddenly they’re all “criminals” or worse.


Direct Sales Success-Little Black Book Of Home Party Marketing Secrets | Stock Market Classes
Pingback posted November 12, 2010 @ 3:11 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Feds indict 5 in car ‘title washing’ North Capitol Street
Pingback posted November 12, 2010 @ 3:12 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Obama for names horn? Ens | MATCH DATING ONLINE ON HERE
Pingback posted November 12, 2010 @ 3:39 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Ex-White Sox scouting exec indicted | MATCH DATING ONLINE ON HERE
Pingback posted November 12, 2010 @ 4:10 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Citizens group touts the “People’s Tool Kit” | MATCH DATING ONLINE ON HERE
Pingback posted November 12, 2010 @ 4:38 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Obama: G20 builds stronger mechanisms for stability (Reuters) | Forex Advice
Pingback posted November 12, 2010 @ 4:41 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


What is taylor gang? :: Apple iPod & iPad Review
Pingback posted November 12, 2010 @ 5:34 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Local restaurants and United Way? help the homeless during holidays | MATCH DATING ONLINE ON HERE
Pingback posted November 12, 2010 @ 6:40 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Latino Republicans Reject Lamar Smith | NewsTaco
Pingback posted November 12, 2010 @ 8:05 am

[...] a group of Latino republicans that call themselves Somos Republicanos has, according to the  Washington Independent, written an “open letter to the future House GOP leadership…asking it to reconsider [...]


What is a good activity? Social? Th, a 16-j? Olds to meet new people? | MATCH DATING ONLINE ON HERE
Pingback posted November 12, 2010 @ 10:42 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Facts
Comment posted November 12, 2010 @ 4:07 pm

THE FACTS ARE THAT JAN BREWER AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE DOING THIS TO GET REELECTED, HERE ARE FACTS.

AS THE GOVERNOR SHE CAN ORDER 5000 NATIONAL GUARDS TO THE BORDER. WHY IS SHE NOT DOING THIS??????????????

1, HOW MUCH MONEY $$$$$$$ IS ALLOCATED TO ENFORCE THIS LAW?? NONE.

2, HOW MANY NEW POLICEMEN / WOMEN SHES HIRED TO HOLD AND PROCESS THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS? NONE.

3, HOW MANY NEW IMMIGRATION JUDGES SHES HIRED TO PROCESS THE THOUSANDS OF DEPORTATION CASES?? NONE.

4, HOW MANY NEW JAILS SHES BUILT TO HOLD THE THOUSANDS OF UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS? NONE.

5, HOW MANY BUSES / PLANES SHES BROUGHT TO DEPORT THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF THOSE WHO ARE ORDERED BY THE IMMIGRATION JUDGES TO BE DEPORTED?? NONE.

CAN ANYONE ANSWER THESE FACTS? THE REPUBLICAN STATES ARE TRYING TO MAKE THIS THEIR PLATFORM, THEY WILL LOSE BIGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG TIME.
ALL ARE GODS CHILDREN. NO HUMAN IS ABOVE ANOTHER. ALL ARE CREATED BY ONE ALMIGHTY GOD WHO LOVES ALL HIS CHILDREN.
I AM NOT SAYING DON’T CLOSE THE BORDERS I AM SAYING STOP THE FOOLISH HATE AND IGNORANCE.

Prison Industry Ties to Anti-Immigration Bills
Tweet Reddit Facebook StumbleUpon Yahoo! Buzz By Elise Foley 9/17/10 11:06 AM

The private detention industry stands to gain substantially from a growing immigrant detention system, so it’s no accident that a lobbying group partially funded by Corrections Corporation of America, or CCA, which operates some of the country’s largest private detention facilities, has had a hand in crafting both Arizona’s harsh SB 1070 immigration law and, now, the copycat bills springing up across the country.

Ties between Arizona lawmakers and CCA are not news, but Think Progress has a good run down of the key points: SB 1070 was drafted with help from the American Legislative Exchange Council, which helps the private sector write legislation for states. CCA, which is slated to receive $74 million for immigration detention centers in the 2010 fiscal year, helps fund the group.

CCA also has close, direct ties with Arizona lawmakers. Gov. Jan Brewer’s deputy chief of staff formerly worked as a lobbyist for CCA — his wife still works as a lobbyist there — and Brewer’s campaign chairman runs a lobbying firm that represents the prison corporation.

Similar ties can be found between CCA and lawmakers in other states who have pushed for anti-immigration laws, such as Tennessee and Colorado. (Read the full rundown for the states here.) And CCA routinely gives money to state lawmakers, both Democrats and Republicans, that have direct connections to the detention business, as The Texas Independent reported last month.

Why is it important? Think Progress explains how anti-immigration bills could help the prison industry make a profit:

http://wildcat.arizona.edu/perspectives/anti-immigration-hysteria-tied-to-the-private-prison-industry-1.1572422
Gov. Jan Brewer, who signed S.B. 1070 into law, and the legislation’s principal architect, Russell Pearce, both have extensive financial ties to the private prison industry powerhouse Corrections Corporation of America, a company which stands to profit in the sum of millions if Arizona’s “papers please” legislation is enacted.

CCA, one of the leading providers of detention and correction services in the country, holds the contract to imprison all federal detainees in the state of Arizona. S.B. 1070 would lead to more arrests on federal immigration charges, causing money to pour into the gargantuan coffers of the private prison industry and directly into the bank accounts of those who are financially tied to it.

Republican state senator Pearce submitted a draft version of S.B. 1070 to the American Legislative Exchange Council for revision months before the bill was introduced to the floor of the Arizona Senate. Pearce is one of 35 Arizona legislators who belong to this organization.

Two years prior, ALEC was the recipient of millions of dollars in contributions from CCA and Geo Group, two of the largest private prison companies in the state.

Pearce’s financial records also indicate that the political action committees funded by both CCA and Geo Group have donated the maximum amount allowable to his campaign.

Gov. Jan Brewer’s deputy chief of staff, Paul Senseman, is a former CCA lobbyist. His wife Kathryn Senseman currently lobbies the state legislature on behalf of the company.

Still more damning is the fact that the governor’s leading policy advisor, J. Charles “Chuck” Coughlin, is the president of Highground Consulting, the lobbying firm which represents CCA’s interests in Arizona.

CCA also contributed a total of $10,000 dollars to the Prop 100 campaign earlier this year, an initiative, along with S.B. 1070, which set the stage for Brewer’s reelection bid.

Phoenix CBS affiliate KPHO was among the first to report on this glaring conflict of interest. In retaliation, the Brewer campaign pulled ll advertisements from the network.
—————————————————————————————————

The economics of immigration, Stephen C. Goss, the chief actuary of the Social Security Administration and someone who enjoys bipartisan support for his straightforwardness, said that by 2007, the Social Security trust fund had received a net benefit of somewhere between $120 billion and $240 billion from unauthorized immigrants.

That represented an astounding 5.4 percent to 10.7 percent of the trust fund’s total assets of $2.24 trillion that year. The cumulative contribution is surely higher now. Unauthorized immigrants paid a net contribution of $12 billion in 2007 alone, Goss said.

Previous estimates circulating publicly and in Congress had placed the annual contributions at roughly half of Goss’s 2007 figure and listed the cumulative benefit on the order of $50 billion.

The Social Security trust fund faces a solvency crisis that would be even more pressing were it not for these payments.

Adding to the Social Security irony is that the restrictionists are mostly OLDER AND RETIRED WHITES from longtime American families. The very people, in other words, who benefit most from the Social Security payments by unauthorized immigrants.

——————————————————-

Moments after signing Arizona’s tough new immigration law in April, Gov. Jan Brewer was asked WHAT A ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT LOOKS LIKE????

The question, posed during a news conference that was broadcast live on TV, seemed to catch Brewer off guard. After a long pause, she said, “I DON’T KNOW WHAT A ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT LOOKS LIKE. I can tell you that there are people in Arizona that ASS-U-ME they know what an illegal immigrant looks like. I DON’T KNOW IF THEY KNOW THAT FOR A FACT OR NOT.”

Her answer cut to the very heart of the controversy surrounding the law, which takes effect July 29. Although there are many people who assume they know what an illegal immigrant looks like, the fact is, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE to tell a person’s immigration status by appearance, experts say.

So despite assurances to the contrary, some civil-rights groups and others fear that enforcement of the law will lead to racial profiling. Several lawsuits already raise worries of civil-rights violations, and a group of Arizona law professors concluded the law authorizes enforcement based on ethnicity. That, they allege, would mean officers would end up harassing and possibly detaining people who aren’t illegal immigrants.

The vast majority of illegal immigrants are Hispanic. But most Hispanics in Arizona are not illegal immigrants – they are legal residents or U.S. citizens, many with roots dating back generations.

Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/2010/07/18/20100718illegal-immigration-profiling.html#ixzz0u2wY1a1d

What both these Republicans FORGOT to Mention in their SPIN POLITICS is that

It’s all about economics! Removing undocumented workers from the U.S. would total a loss of $1.8 trillion in annual spending and $651.5 billion in annual economic output, according to a study by the economic analysis firm The Perryman Group. It would cost about $28 billion per year to apprehend illegal immigrants, $6 billion a year to detain them, $500 million for extra beds, $2 million to judicially process them and $1.6 billion to transport them home. $230 Billion is the estimated amount it would cost over the next five years to enact the scenario of the mass-deportation caucus and deport the undocumented population, according to a report by the Center for American Progress. Legalization of undocumented immigrants would significantly expand the economy—by a cumulative $1.5 trillion in gross domestic product over 10 years. A deportation approach, by contrast, would have the cumulative effect of draining $2.5 trillion over 10 years from the U.S. economy. Illegal immigrants are paying their share of taxes, they pay the same taxes as you and me when they purchase anything, They don’t carry a card that says Undocumented Immigrant, DON’T CHARGE TAXES
Start looking at FACTS & NUMBERS.

Who’s behind these laws?

FOLLOW THE MONEY$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Many may want them gone, but illegal immigrants in Oklahoma can be good business.

So say county officials who handle the purse strings of some sheriff’s departments in the state. Millions in revenue for transporting and detaining immigrants for the federal government have financed jobs, departments and, in some cases, entire jails.

“It’s a good business plan,” said Tim Albin, chief of the services division that oversees the budget for the Tulsa County Sheriffs Department. “It allows us to bank and put money back and carry over for other things.”

Read more: http://newsok.com/jailing-immigrants-adds-funds-for-some-counties/article/3489827#ixzz0yC9uF24O

The Immigration Reform Law Institute, or IRLI, the legal arm of the Federation for American Immigration Reform, or FAIR, drafted the Arizona law and most of the copycat bills. The Southern Poverty Law Center designated FAIR a hate group because of its founder’s writings, its repeated participation with white nationalist groups, and its receipt of major funding from a racist organization.

Copycat laws frequently rely on the work of attorney Kris Kobach, who works for IRLI. Kobach’s lawyering has cost localities who have hired him millions of dollars while the laws have been found unconstitutional. The Arizona law was brought forth by State Senator Russell Pearce, who the Arizona press has described as having a history of associating with neo-Nazis and sending anti-Semitic emails.


Facts
Comment posted November 12, 2010 @ 4:08 pm

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/reagan-insider-gop-destroyed-us-economy-2010-08-10

This week, the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) came out with a report entitled, The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on U.S. Taxpayers, which discusses the costs of unauthorized immigration to the United States. As usual, FAIR has put out a highly misleading fiscal snapshot of the costs allegedly imposed on U.S. taxpayers by unauthorized immigrants and completely discounts the economic contributions of unauthorized workers and consumers. Moreover, FAIR inflates their costs in a variety of ways and conveniently ignores any contributions that would offset these costs.

While the publication is long and deals with a wide range of issues that warrant more dissection by credible economic experts, the trade publication Education Week has already begun the deconstruction with an item that sheds light on their misleading claims about providing English language services in schools.

Another argument FAIR makes, which makes it hard to glean what their solution would be is the high cost of deporting undocumented workers which FAIR blames on the immigrants themselves. It’s a somewhat circular argument to say that the cost of undocumented immigrants includes the cost of failing law enforcement efforts. So, in essence, FAIR is saying that the deport-them-all approach costs too much money and doesn’t work. Yet their “solution” is to spend even more money on enforcement.

FAIR’s data is meant only to reinforce their vision of “attrition through enforcement.” It is not rooted in an effort to move the immigration debate forward. Therefore, passing comprehensive immigration reform – which would yield a cumulative $1.5 trillion in added U.S. gross domestic product over 10 years – is the only sound economic decision the United States can make.

SOURCE Immigration Policy Center

Who’s behind these laws?

The Immigration Reform Law Institute, or IRLI, the legal arm of the Federation for American Immigration Reform, or FAIR, drafted the Arizona law and most of the copycat bills. The Southern Poverty Law Center designated FAIR a hate group because of its founder’s writings, its repeated participation with white nationalist groups, and its receipt of major funding from a racist organization.

Copycat laws frequently rely on the work of attorney Kris Kobach, who works for IRLI. Kobach’s lawyering has cost localities who have hired him millions of dollars while the laws have been found unconstitutional. The Arizona law was brought forth by State Senator Russell Pearce, who the Arizona press has described as having a history of associating with neo-Nazis and sending anti-Semitic emails.


Facts
Comment posted November 12, 2010 @ 4:08 pm

Ignorance is Bliss: Those who have NO CLUE or QUALIFICATIONS about Immigration are those who show their IGNORANCE :)

There is NO SUCH WORD AS ‘ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT” in Blacks Law Dictionary, or In Merriam Websters Dictionary. Get Educated .

“Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said Wednesday that the claim by some conservative activists that illegal immigration is to blame for all of the state’s fiscal problems is ignorant and bigoted.”

Arturo E. Ocampo of Tracy has been a practicing attorney since 1985, In the 20-plus years I have spent studying, lecturing and litigating immigration issues, two things have always amazed me. The first is the amount and intensity of hate spewed against undocumented workers. The second is the amount of misinformation that is published about them.

On this second point, the quote from Mark Twain is illustrative. “A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.” I suppose this may be true in part because misinformation, like a lie, requires no accuracy, validation or research; all of which are time-consuming practices.

The recent letters alleging that all undocumented workers are “criminals,” and specifically Veronica Suarez, whose plight was written about in the Tracy Press recently, is a criminal are factually incorrect.

According to the facts (as stated in Sharon Franceschi’s Sept. 7 commentary) Saurez entered the U.S. on a valid visa, overstayed her visa when it expired, resulting in her unlawful immigration status. None of these acts, as stated by Franceschi, constitute a crime under federal or state law. Overstaying a valid visa under the Immigration and Naturalization Act is a civil violation of the law, not a criminal violation. Being in the U.S. in under undocumented status is not a criminal violation, but a civil violation of the INA.

The facts, as stated by Franceschi, do not indicate that Suarez has committed any crime. To call her a criminal is erroneous at best, and libelous at worst.

Furthermore, it is an Americanism that a person is innocent until proven guilty. So until Suarez (or any other undocumented person) is charged and found guilty of a crime, it would be inappropriate to call them “criminals.”

It is important to note that there is a very large difference between civil and criminal violations of law. The distinction is so important that the law makes the erroneous allegation that one has committed a crime of slander or libel, (which means liability is automatic even without proof of damages). One who violates the civil law is no more a criminal than someone who has breached a contract or accidentally damaged another’s property.

It is true that entering the United States without inspection is a misdemeanor under the INA. The misdemeanor is completed once an individual’s entry is complete. Suarez, according to Franceschi, did not enter without inspection; she entered with a valid visa. According to U.S. Immigration and Citizenship Services statistics, about 40 percent of undocumented persons enter legally and overstay their visas (which, as stated above, is not a crime). Consequently, at least 40 percent of the undocumented population has committed no crime in regards to their immigration status.

Therefore, one cannot assume that a person has committed a crime simply because they are undocumented.

Franceschi is also in error in her allegation that getting married and having children while being undocumented in the U.S. is a violation of the law. It is not. Franceschi goes on to say that Suarez “apparently bought a house illegally.” It is unlikely that Franceschi knows exactly how Suarez purchased her home. Consequently, any allegation of illegality is, at a minimum, irresponsible.

It is also important to note that the Immigration and Citizenship Services doesn’t consider all undocumented persons criminals. When the Immigration and Citizenship Services publishes information about its enforcement activities involving undocumented workers, it are always sure to make a distinction between “criminal” and noncriminal aliens.

Another myth is that the term “illegal aliens” is a term of art or is legal jargon. This term is not found anywhere in the INA or in Blacks Law Dictionary. The INA refers to undocumented persons as either an EWI (entered without inspection) or as someone who has overstayed their visa. “Illegal aliens” is a term invented by anti-immigrant groups designed to put undocumented persons in the worst possible light and to instill fear in Americans. It is intentionally designed to associate undocumented persons with criminality.

This xenophobic view that undocumented persons are “simply criminals” comes from the historical stereotype that the foreign-born, especially undocumented immigrants, are responsible for higher crime rates. This misconception has deep roots in American public opinion and popular myth. This myth, however, is not supported empirically and has repeatedly been refuted by scientific studies. Both contemporary and historical data, (including U.S. governmental studies) have shown that immigration is associated with lower crime rates.

The studies have uniformly shown that recent immigrants (including the undocumented) are less likely to be involved in violent crime, and that when there is an increase in immigration patterns, violent crime decreases. This has been shown to be true in large cities with heavy immigrant populations.

In the most recent of these studies, The Myth of Immigrant Criminality and the Paradox of Assimilation (2007), from the Immigrant Policy Institute, it was found that among men age 18 to 39 (who are the vast majority of inmates in federal and state prisons and local jails), immigrants were five times less likely to be incarcerated than the native-born in 2000.

During the Proposition 187 debate, then-Gov. Pete Wilson published statistics that stated that
12 percent to 15 percent of the state prison population had Immigration and Citizenship Services holds or potential holds. The Department of Corrections analyst who compiled these numbers said Immigration and Citizenship Services holds are placed on inmates who were born outside of the U.S. (therefore 12 percent to 15 percent of the prison population was immigrants). The immigrant population at the time in California hovered at about 25 percent, showing immigrants were much less likely to be incarcerated than the native born in California.

In short, the data shows you are much safer if your neighbor is an immigrant.

Franceschi owes Suarez an apology. I am also surprised that the Tracy Press allowed a commentary to run without checking the facts. Although commentaries are designed to allow for the expression of differing opinions, the First Amendment is not as generous with misstatements of facts — especially when the facts can be libelous.

For the immigration debate to be a healthy one, we should strive for a debate based on facts, not myth or tired stereotypes. We should also not let our position on this topic strip us of one of the great qualities we possess as people — the ability to be compassionate.

Arturo E. Ocampo of Tracy has been a practicing attorney since 1985, with an expertise in immigration rights and class action lawsuits on behalf of immigrants, including the way the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 was implemented, Border Patrol’s raids and Proposition 187. He is director of diversity and equal employment opportunity for the San Jose/Evergreen Community College District.


Facts
Comment posted November 12, 2010 @ 4:14 pm

I AM NOT SAYING DONT CLOSE THE BORDERS. I AM SAYING STOP THE HATE.

Before you Scream and show Ignorance and Hate at least read the Immigration Law regarding Undocumented Immigrants.

THE UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS ARE PAYING MORE TAXES THAN YOU THINK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IMMIGRANTS AND TAXES:
Q: “Is it true that illegal immigrants don’t pay taxes and drain our economy?”
A: As Ben Franklin said, “Nothing is certain but death and taxes.” Like the rest of us, unauthorized immigrants pay taxes on their property and anything they buy. More than half of them have taxes taken out of their paychecks, but because our immigration system is dysfunctional, these taxes are paid under false Social Security numbers. We need a new regimen in which we know who is paying taxes and can ensure that no one is getting a free ride. The only way to do that is to pull unauthorized immigrants out of the shadows and get them on the right side of the law.
Three state-level studies have found that unauthorized immigrants pay more in taxes than they use in benefits. In Iowa, unauthorized immigrants pay an estimated $40 to $62 million in state taxes, while they and their employers contribute an additional $50 million to $77.8 million in federal, Social Security, and Medicare taxes from which they will never benefit. In Oregon, unauthorized immigrants—who are not eligible for any state benefits—pay between $134 million and $187 million in taxes each year. Finally, in Texas, the State Comptroller found that, without unauthorized residents, the gross state product in 2005 would have been $17.7 billion less.
————————

The economics of immigration, Stephen C. Goss, the chief actuary of the Social Security Administration and someone who enjoys bipartisan support for his straightforwardness, said that by 2007, the Social Security trust fund had received a net benefit of somewhere between $120 billion and $240 billion from unauthorized immigrants.

That represented an astounding 5.4 percent to 10.7 percent of the trust fund’s total assets of $2.24 trillion that year. The cumulative contribution is surely higher now. Unauthorized immigrants paid a net contribution of $12 billion in 2007 alone, Goss said.

Previous estimates circulating publicly and in Congress had placed the annual contributions at roughly half of Goss’s 2007 figure and listed the cumulative benefit on the order of $50 billion.

The Social Security trust fund faces a solvency crisis that would be even more pressing were it not for these payments.

Adding to the Social Security irony is that the restrictionists are mostly OLDER AND RETIRED WHITES from longtime American families. The very people, in other words, who benefit most from the Social Security payments by unauthorized immigrants.

————————————-

The Undocumented Immigrants pay the exact same amount of taxes like you and me when they buy Things, rent a house, fill up gas, drink a beer or wine, buy appliances, play the states lottery and mega millions . Below are the links to just a few sites that will show you exactly how much tax you or the Undocumented Immigrant pays , so you see they are NOT FREELOADERS, THEY PAY TAXES AND TOLLS Exactly the same as you, Now if you take out 10% from your states /city Budget what will your city/state look like financially ?

Stop your folly thinking , you are wise USE YOUR WISDOM to see the reality. They pay more taxes than you think, Including FEDERAL INCOME TAX using a ITN Number that is given to them by the IRS, Social Security Taxes and State taxes that are withheld form their paychecks automatically.

Taxes, paid by You & the Undocumented are the same in each state check your state : http://www.taxadmin.org/fta/rate/sales.html

GAS Taxes paid by you & the Undocumented are the same. Go to and check out your states tax; http://www.gaspricewatch.com/usgastaxes.asp

Cigarette Taxes paid by you & the Undocumented are the same, check this out in : http://www.taxadmin.org/fta/rate/cigarett.html

Clothing Sales Taxes, are the same paid by you & the Undocumented Immigrant; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sales_taxes_in_the_United_States

City Taxes, are the same paid by you or the Undocumented, since he pays rent and the LANDLORD pays the city : http://www.town-usa.com/statetax/statetaxlist.html

Beer Taxes, are the same paid by you or the Undocumented: http://www.taxadmin.org/fta/rate/beer.html

TAX DATA : http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxdata/show/245.html

Eight million Undocumented immigrants pay Social Security, Medicare and income taxes. Denying public services to people who pay their taxes is an affront to America’s bedrock belief in fairness. But many “pull-up-the-drawbridge” politicians want to do just that when it comes to Undocumented immigrants.

The fact that Undocumented immigrants pay taxes at all will come as news to many Americans. A stunning two thirds of Undocumented immigrants pay Medicare, Social Security and personal income taxes.

Yet, nativists like Congressman Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., have popularized the notion that illegal aliens are a colossal drain on the nation’s hospitals, schools and welfare programs — consuming services that they don’t pay for.

In reality, the 1996 welfare reform bill disqualified Undocumented immigrants from nearly all means tested government programs including food stamps, housing assistance, Medicaid and Medicare-funded hospitalization.

The only services that illegals can still get are emergency medical care and K-12 education. Nevertheless, Tancredo and his ilk pushed a bill through the House criminalizing all aid to illegal aliens — even private acts of charity by priests, nurses and social workers.

Potentially, any soup kitchen that offers so much as a free lunch to an illegal could face up to five years in prison and seizure of assets. The Senate bill that recently collapsed would have tempered these draconian measures against private aid.

But no one — Democrat or Republican — seems to oppose the idea of withholding public services. Earlier this year, Congress passed a law that requires everyone who gets Medicaid — the government-funded health care program for the poor — to offer proof of U.S. citizenship so we can avoid “theft of these benefits by illegal aliens,” as Rep. Charlie Norwood, R-Ga., puts it. But, immigrants aren’t flocking to the United States to mooch off the government.

According to a study by the Urban Institute, the 1996 welfare reform effort dramatically reduced the use of welfare by undocumented immigrant households, exactly as intended. And another vital thing happened in 1996: the Internal Revenue Service began issuing identification numbers to enable illegal immigrants who don’t have Social Security numbers to file taxes.

One might have imagined that those fearing deportation or confronting the prospect of paying for their safety net through their own meager wages would take a pass on the IRS’ scheme. Not so. Close to 8 million of the 12 million or so illegal aliens in the country today file personal income taxes using these numbers, contributing billions to federal coffers.

No doubt they hope that this will one day help them acquire legal status — a plaintive expression of their desire to play by the rules and come out of the shadows. What’s more, aliens who are not self-employed have Social Security and Medicare taxes automatically withheld from their paychecks.

Since undocumented workers have only fake numbers, they’ll never be able to collect the benefits these taxes are meant to pay for. Last year, the revenues from these fake numbers — that the Social Security administration stashes in the “earnings suspense file” — added up to 10 percent of the Social Security surplus.

The file is growing, on average, by more than $50 billion a year. Beyond federal taxes, all illegals automatically pay state sales taxes that contribute toward the upkeep of public facilities such as roads that they use, and property taxes through their rent that contribute toward the schooling of their children.

The non-partisan National Research Council found that when the taxes paid by the children of low-skilled immigrant families — most of whom are illegal — are factored in, they contribute on average $80,000 more to federal coffers than they consume. Yes, many illegal migrants impose a strain on border communities on whose doorstep they first arrive, broke and unemployed.

To solve this problem equitably, these communities ought to receive the surplus taxes that federal government collects from immigrants. But the real reason border communities are strained is the lack of a guest worker program.

Such a program would match willing workers with willing employers in advance so that they wouldn’t be stuck for long periods where they disembark while searching for jobs. The cost of undocumented aliens is an issue that immigrant bashers have created to whip up indignation against people they don’t want here in the first place.

With the Senate having just returned from yet another vacation and promising to revisit the stalled immigration bill, politicians ought to set the record straight: Illegals are not milking the government. If anything, it is the other way around.


Facts
Comment posted November 12, 2010 @ 4:15 pm

hat both these Republicans FORGOT to Mention in their SPIN POLITICS is that

It’s all about economics! Removing undocumented workers from the U.S. would total a loss of $1.8 trillion in annual spending and $651.5 billion in annual economic output, according to a study by the economic analysis firm The Perryman Group. It would cost about $28 billion per year to apprehend illegal immigrants, $6 billion a year to detain them, $500 million for extra beds, $2 million to judicially process them and $1.6 billion to transport them home. $230 Billion is the estimated amount it would cost over the next five years to enact the scenario of the mass-deportation caucus and deport the undocumented population, according to a report by the Center for American Progress. Legalization of undocumented immigrants would significantly expand the economy—by a cumulative $1.5 trillion in gross domestic product over 10 years. A deportation approach, by contrast, would have the cumulative effect of draining $2.5 trillion over 10 years from the U.S. economy. Illegal immigrants are paying their share of taxes, they pay the same taxes as you and me when they purchase anything, They don’t carry a card that says Undocumented Immigrant, DON’T CHARGE TAXES
Start looking at FACTS & NUMBERS.


Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the party’s 2012 chances | Latino News
Pingback posted November 12, 2010 @ 11:55 am

[...] From: The Washington Independent [...]


Mom’s secret weapon: the God Box | MEET FRIENDS ONLINE ON HERE
Pingback posted November 12, 2010 @ 3:50 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Irvine sets up tribute to honor war dead | MATCH DATING ONLINE ON HERE
Pingback posted November 12, 2010 @ 9:35 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


franchise opp. zero out of pocket to start! 400 units sell per day | Stock Market Classes
Pingback posted November 13, 2010 @ 3:30 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Benefits Of Renting A Saint Tropez Villa
Pingback posted November 13, 2010 @ 3:32 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


LifeWay Releases HCSB Study Bible | 24h-tips.com
Pingback posted November 13, 2010 @ 5:09 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the party’s 2012 chances &laquo… [...]


Mortgage | Obama’s G20 Disappointment | Mortgages
Pingback posted November 13, 2010 @ 5:47 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the party’s 2012 chances &laquo… [...]


Retail Market Makers – The vast majority of online forex dealers are represented by this group of brokers. www.forexonline.co.nz :: Trade Forex Online
Pingback posted November 13, 2010 @ 6:05 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Supreme Court Hears Gender Rights Case | MATCH DATING ONLINE ON HERE
Pingback posted November 13, 2010 @ 9:22 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Bieber promotes his book, talks music, God and hair | celeb life
Pingback posted November 13, 2010 @ 12:21 pm

[...] Latino party group: Steve King directive on migration would blackball the … [...]


Forex BulletProof- Join the Revolution! | Stock Market Classes
Pingback posted November 13, 2010 @ 2:06 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


frank bowers
Comment posted November 13, 2010 @ 10:54 pm

You are so full of yourself it is a shame. The illegals drain over 18 billion a year in food stamps alone. They drain another 17 billion a year in birthing in hospitals with medicare. No husband in house explain how many little JESUS we now have in
Texas alone not to mentin the other 49 states. It would not cost any where near 28 billon to round up the illegal son of abitches and their mares or whores birthing the little bastards from south of our US Border.Legalizing the bastards would only give them full rights to vote and nothing more. As it is they already do everthing they want and pay no taxes and even if legal they will still be contractors and pay not one fucking penny in tax but have more kids to get more food stamps. Look how the bastards now all have 6 to 10 kids where as the citizens don’t as they can not get free birthing in the hospitals and have to pay for it all. Frank Bowers


With 68% in Favor of immigration reform, and 54% in favor of DADT repeal…? | call center software
Pingback posted November 13, 2010 @ 7:22 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


$129M lottery ticket bought at porn shop – The Middletown Press …
Pingback posted November 13, 2010 @ 8:33 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the party’s 2012 chances &laquo… [...]


captainkangaroo » Blog Archive » Top Grammy Winning Artists Pay Tribute to Fred Rogers with ‘Songs from the Neighborhood’
Pingback posted November 13, 2010 @ 9:45 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Exclusive Warhammer 40k Painted Army Ork Death Skull Mega Nobz - War Hammer 40K Novels - War Hammer 40K Novels
Pingback posted November 14, 2010 @ 8:53 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Jewelry Entscheidungstr amateur hunters find it convenient to group swap f? R l ‘? Exchange beads, tools | MATCH DATING ONLINE ON HERE
Pingback posted November 14, 2010 @ 10:32 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Opeth Albums- Listen to Unconventional Metal | Collectible Stamps
Pingback posted November 14, 2010 @ 11:04 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


World of Islam » Blog Archive » Australian politician Hanson abandons move to UK
Pingback posted November 14, 2010 @ 4:06 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King heading upon immigration would kill a … [...]


illegal is illegal
Comment posted November 15, 2010 @ 12:42 am

Undocumented means no paperwork, no social security card so how are they paying all these taxes? They aren’t paying federal taxes! Are they paying state taxes? I doubt it. About the only taxes they are paying if here illegally is when they rent-big deal! Oh and when they shop. Big deal! And they are sucking it all up in social service programs, hospitals, you name it-the American tax payers of all races are paying for illegal aliens. Some of you say haters. Take a look at the laws of all other countries compared to America’s laws and tell me what laws are the strictest. Not the US! We welcome all races Legally. The Constitution was never written to mean people could come here illegally and have babies and then their babies could be considered Americans. That is something twisted around for illegal aliens advantage. If you claim to know the Constitution so well, you’d know that. There actually doesn’t need to be any new laws or changes to the Constitution. It’s already clearly stated the way it’s meant. What is wrong with illegal aliens having their babies at home? What is wrong with them remaining citizens of the same country their parents are from and are citizens of? It’s that way in every other country. Going to call them all haters too? When they come here and have their babies, why don’t they pay for their births here? Where are the dads? Are the dads paying child support? Get the picture? It’s called using America.


Tn Visa Expert | auto accident lawyers
Pingback posted November 14, 2010 @ 11:14 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Ufc/mma Big Money Making Opportunity!!! | Protraffic Portal
Pingback posted November 16, 2010 @ 4:00 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


“Spectacular 5 Nation Scandinavian Cruise” On Costa’s Atlantica | reservationsfor2.com
Pingback posted November 28, 2010 @ 5:32 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


This Pipeline Is Totally Tubular | reservationsfor2.com
Pingback posted December 3, 2010 @ 1:16 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


Visa Informer
Trackback posted December 4, 2010 @ 6:21 pm

Call for Irish to get unused Aussie E3 visas to U.S. – Irish Central…

We have added a Trackback to your article on the Visa Informer….


Fufuhui
Comment posted December 6, 2010 @ 3:56 am

Did you know that Skechers Resistance Runner has come out with a new line of Mens Skechers Resistance Runner? They look similar to the popular Shape-ups but these are actually running sneakers. The new Womens Skechers Resistance Runner retail for about $150. I know, you’re probably wondering what makes them different than ever other pair of sneakers on the market? Let me break it down for you. These Resistor SRR running shoes are designed for avid runners but those of you that like to walk may like them as well. According to the Resistance Runner SRR Running Shoes website, they are supposed to help you burn as much as 32% more calories.Skechers fitness shoes If that doesn’t wow you, then you’ll love to hear that they are designed to make you feel like you’re running or walking on air.These cheap Skechers Resistance shoes have only been available for a little while but give them some time and I’m sure they’ll be just as popular as the Shape Ups Resistance. But you tell me. Do you think that these Resistance Runners will become a hit? Would you try them? Sound off in the comment section below.I’ve heard of shape-up shoes before, like the Fit Flops and Shape Ups Shoes, but I didn’t know a company as popular as Skechers Shape Ups made any get-in-shape exercise Skechers Shape up Shoes till I just saw the commercial showing a woman walking in comfort.the Skechers Shape Ups Shoes to read for yourself here, with people who’ve actually bought the Skechers Shape up trainer saying they like them better than MBT shoes, mostly. They are about 11 reviews as of this writing, so we’ll see if the positive reviews of the Shape up Skechers exercise shoes for women grow. see searches coming in for the Skechers ShapeUps for men, too — after all, men like getting in Discount Shape up Shoes — so I hunted down these Cheap Skechers Shape Ups Shoes Lace Up, right now on Amazon.Those shape ups outlet for men running? Skechers Womens Shape Ups — I guess you can run in them, huh? — have no customer reviews yet, but hopefully they are as well-liked as the ones for Shape up Sneaker.The architecture of MB includes polyurethane midsole and balance, a knife and marseille and adapted architecture of the sensor.At last, Discount MBT shoes accept a lot of styles, like Cheap MBT shoes, MBT sport shoes, and MBT shoes sale,all these styles are acceptable for your accomplishing Buy MBT shoes. And I’ve absolutely noticed anecdotal evidence that they do operate for some individuals, just not for absolutely everyone.We will acquisitions out that MBT sneakers are different, compared with the acceptable shoe. Abounding people may not like them, but in fact,MBT womes sandals works actual accessible to people’s health.


Health And Safety For Employees In Lucky Group | MEET FRIENDS ONLINE ON HERE
Pingback posted December 29, 2010 @ 4:54 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the … [...]


BlueRidgeForum » A Tale of Two Kings: See No Shariah, Speak No Illegals
Pingback posted January 21, 2011 @ 9:35 am

[...] this regard, Elise Foley of the Washington Independent had reported last November that – “Somos Republicans, a Latino group from the Southwest, wrote an [...]


A Tale of Two Kings: See No Shariah, Speak No Illegals
Pingback posted January 22, 2011 @ 4:47 pm

[...] [...]


Rockford Website Design | Pay Per Click Advertising | Make Money Online! To Be an Internet Millionnaire !
Pingback posted March 6, 2011 @ 10:19 am

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the party’s 2012 chances &laquo… [...]


Creative project ideas? | Online Marketing | Make Money Online! To Be an Internet Millionnaire !
Pingback posted March 6, 2011 @ 2:09 pm

[...] Latino GOP group: Steve King leading on immigration would kill the party’s 2012 chances &laquo… [...]


Ball Grown
Comment posted March 9, 2011 @ 2:26 am

Beading spring wedding dresses Beading spring wedding dresses Beading spring wedding dresses
Beading summer wedding dresses Beading summer wedding dresses Beading summer wedding dresses
Beading top selling homecoming dresses Beading top selling homecoming dresses Beading top selling homecoming dresses
Beading top selling wedding dresses Beading top selling wedding dresses Beading top selling wedding dresses
Beading venice film festival Beading venice film festival Beading venice film festival
Beading wedding dresses Beading wedding dresses Beading wedding dresses
Beading wedding dresses 2011 Beading wedding dresses 2011 Beading wedding dresses 2011
Beading wedding dresses for europe Beading wedding dresses for europe Beading wedding dresses for europe
Beading wedding dresses in color Beading wedding dresses in color Beading wedding dresses in color
Beading winter wedding dresses Beading winter wedding dresses Beading winter wedding dresses
Black ball gowns Black ball gowns Black ball gowns
Black bridesmaid dresses Black bridesmaid dresses Black bridesmaid dresses
Black cannes film festival Black cannes film festival Black cannes film festival
Black elegant evening dresses Black elegant evening dresses Black elegant evening dresses
Black emmy dresses Black emmy dresses Black emmy dresses
Black evening dresses Black evening dresses Black evening dresses
Black evening dresses 2011 Black evening dresses 2011 Black evening dresses 2011
Black flower girl dresses Black flower girl dresses Black flower girl dresses
Black golden globe dresses Black golden globe dresses Black golden globe dresses
Black grammy dresses Black grammy dresses Black grammy dresses
Black holiday dresses Black holiday dresses Black holiday dresses
Black homecoming dresses Black homecoming dresses Black homecoming dresses
Black hot sale flower girl dresses Black hot sale flower girl dresses Black hot sale flower girl dresses
Black junior bridesmaid dresses Black junior bridesmaid dresses Black junior bridesmaid dresses
Black little black dresses Black little black dresses Black little black dresses
Black long bridesmaid dresses Black long bridesmaid dresses Black long bridesmaid dresses
Black modest elegant prom dresses Black modest elegant prom dresses Black modest elegant prom dresses
Black mother of the bridal dresses with jacket Black mother of the bridal dresses with jacket Black mother of the bridal dresses with jacket
Black oscar dresses Black oscar dresses Black oscar dresses
Black party girls dresses Black party girls dresses Black party girls dresses
Black plus size evening dresses Black plus size evening dresses Black plus size evening dresses
Black prom dresses Black prom dresses Black prom dresses
Black short bridesmaid dresses Black short bridesmaid dresses Black short bridesmaid dresses
Black short evening dresses Black short evening dresses Black short evening dresses
Black short homecoming dresses Black short homecoming dresses Black short homecoming dresses
Black short prom dresses Black short prom dresses Black short prom dresses
Black simple bridesmaid dresses Black simple bridesmaid dresses Black simple bridesmaid dresses
Black top selling bridesmaid dresses Black top selling bridesmaid dresses Black top selling bridesmaid dresses
Blue ball gowns Blue ball gowns Blue ball gowns
Blue bridesmaid dresses Blue bridesmaid dresses Blue bridesmaid dresses
Blue cocktail dresses Blue cocktail dresses Blue cocktail dresses


Ball Grown
Comment posted March 9, 2011 @ 2:26 am

Beading spring wedding dresses Beading spring wedding dresses Beading spring wedding dresses
Beading summer wedding dresses Beading summer wedding dresses Beading summer wedding dresses
Beading top selling homecoming dresses Beading top selling homecoming dresses Beading top selling homecoming dresses
Beading top selling wedding dresses Beading top selling wedding dresses Beading top selling wedding dresses
Beading venice film festival Beading venice film festival Beading venice film festival
Beading wedding dresses Beading wedding dresses Beading wedding dresses
Beading wedding dresses 2011 Beading wedding dresses 2011 Beading wedding dresses 2011
Beading wedding dresses for europe Beading wedding dresses for europe Beading wedding dresses for europe
Beading wedding dresses in color Beading wedding dresses in color Beading wedding dresses in color
Beading winter wedding dresses Beading winter wedding dresses Beading winter wedding dresses
Black ball gowns Black ball gowns Black ball gowns
Black bridesmaid dresses Black bridesmaid dresses Black bridesmaid dresses
Black cannes film festival Black cannes film festival Black cannes film festival
Black elegant evening dresses Black elegant evening dresses Black elegant evening dresses
Black emmy dresses Black emmy dresses Black emmy dresses
Black evening dresses Black evening dresses Black evening dresses
Black evening dresses 2011 Black evening dresses 2011 Black evening dresses 2011
Black flower girl dresses Black flower girl dresses Black flower girl dresses
Black golden globe dresses Black golden globe dresses Black golden globe dresses
Black grammy dresses Black grammy dresses Black grammy dresses
Black holiday dresses Black holiday dresses Black holiday dresses
Black homecoming dresses Black homecoming dresses Black homecoming dresses
Black hot sale flower girl dresses Black hot sale flower girl dresses Black hot sale flower girl dresses
Black junior bridesmaid dresses Black junior bridesmaid dresses Black junior bridesmaid dresses
Black little black dresses Black little black dresses Black little black dresses
Black long bridesmaid dresses Black long bridesmaid dresses Black long bridesmaid dresses
Black modest elegant prom dresses Black modest elegant prom dresses Black modest elegant prom dresses
Black mother of the bridal dresses with jacket Black mother of the bridal dresses with jacket Black mother of the bridal dresses with jacket
Black oscar dresses Black oscar dresses Black oscar dresses
Black party girls dresses Black party girls dresses Black party girls dresses
Black plus size evening dresses Black plus size evening dresses Black plus size evening dresses
Black prom dresses Black prom dresses Black prom dresses
Black short bridesmaid dresses Black short bridesmaid dresses Black short bridesmaid dresses
Black short evening dresses Black short evening dresses Black short evening dresses
Black short homecoming dresses Black short homecoming dresses Black short homecoming dresses
Black short prom dresses Black short prom dresses Black short prom dresses
Black simple bridesmaid dresses Black simple bridesmaid dresses Black simple bridesmaid dresses
Black top selling bridesmaid dresses Black top selling bridesmaid dresses Black top selling bridesmaid dresses
Blue ball gowns Blue ball gowns Blue ball gowns
Blue bridesmaid dresses Blue bridesmaid dresses Blue bridesmaid dresses
Blue cocktail dresses Blue cocktail dresses Blue cocktail dresses


Tangyuyund
Comment posted June 3, 2011 @ 5:12 am

Some 2007 microsoft office want to cheapest microsoft office 2010 put cheap office 2010 laptop microsoft office 2010 cheap screen Office 2007 Download into Office 2007 Professional the MS Office 2007 projector Microsoft Office 2010 or want Buy Windows 7 to take in microsoft office professional 2007 large microsoft office 2007 ultimate display cheap microsoft office 2007 notebooks outlook 2010 download at MS Office 2010 home. However, Download Office 2010 they microsoft office 07 may Office 2007 found powerpoint 2010 sometimes Microsoft Office 2007 does Microsoft Windows 7 not Office 2010 respond office professional plus 2010 when Windows 7 you Win 7 switch, Download Windows 7 or the office 2010 home and student screen office professional plus 2010 does product key for microsoft office 2010 show, microsoft office 2010 activation key the microsoft office student 2010 display microsoft office 2010 home & student is microsoft office student offer complete. Or key for microsoft office 2007 you do microsoft office 2007 home and student product key not know microsoft office 2007 activation key how to microsoft office product key 2007 switch microsoft office 2007 home and student download the power point 2010 laptop to microsoft office 2010 student the projector. microsoft office 2010 64 bit will microsoft office 2010 online make “Win P” key.


Tangyuyund
Comment posted June 3, 2011 @ 5:14 am

Today, [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2010.html]Office 2010[/url] like to [url=http://software-stocks.com/microsoft-office-2010-professional-64-bit-plus.html]office professional plus 2010[/url] recommended [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2010/microsoft-office-2010-professional-64-bit.html][b]Office 2010 Key[/b][/url] gadgets [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2010/microsoft-office-2010-professional-64-bit.html]office 2010 professional plus[/url] to everyone [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2010/microsoft-office-2010-professional-64-bit-plus.html]office professional 2010 plus[/url] which [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2010/microsoft-office-2010-home-and-student-32-bit.html]office 2010 product key[/url] used to [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2010/microsoft-office-2010-home-and-student-64-bit.html][b]microsoft office 2010 key[/b][/url] change [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2010/microsoft-office-2010-home-and-student-32-bit.html]microsoft office 2010 product key[/url] the background [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2010/microsoft-office-2010-professional-64-bit-plus.html]Microsoft Office Professional 2010 Plus[/url] image [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2010/microsoft-office-2010-professional-32-bit-plus.html]microsoft office 2010 professional plus[/url] when [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2010/microsoft-office-2010-professional-32-bit.html]Office Professional 2010[/url] start [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2010/microsoft-office-2010-professional-32-bit-plus.html][b]Office Professional Plus 2010[/b][/url] the [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2010/microsoft-office-2010-professional-64-bit-plus.html]Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2010[/url] login [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2010/microsoft-office-2010-professional-32-bit.html]Office 2010 Pro[/url] screen, [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2010/microsoft-office-2010-professional-64-bit.html]Office 2010 Professional[/url] will [url=http://software-stocks.com]Microsoft Office 2010[/url] any [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2010.html]Download Office 2010[/url] registry [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2010.html]MS Office 2010[/url] file [url=http://software-stocks.com/office]Cheap office 2010[/url] of [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2010/microsoft-office-2010-professional-32-bit.html][b]Microsoft Office 2010 Download[/b][/url] the system. [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2010/microsoft-office-2010-professional-32-bit.html]Office 2010 Download[/url] we [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2010/microsoft-office-2010-home-and-student-32-bit.html]Buy Office 2010[/url] need to [url=http://software-stocks.com/windows-7.html]Windows 7[/url] do is [url=http://software-stocks.com/windows-7.html]Microsoft Windows 7[/url] download this [url=http://software-stocks.com/windows-7/windows-7-home-premium-32bit.html][b]Win 7[/b][/url] little tool, [url=http://software-stocks.com/windows-7.html]Download Windows 7[/url] and [url=http://software-stocks.com/windows-7.html]Buy Windows 7[/url] then [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2007.html]Office 2007[/url] run [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2007.html]Microsoft Office 2007[/url] as an [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2007.html][b]Office 2007 Professional[/b][/url] administrator. [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2007/microsoft-office-professional-2007-full-version.html]Office 2007 Download[/url] , We can [url=http://software-stocks.com/office-2007.html]MS Office 2007[/url] screen.


xn--tumaczenia-9zb angielski zabrze
Comment posted September 5, 2011 @ 6:05 am

Thanks , I’ve recently been looking for info about this topic for ages and yours is the best I’ve discovered so far. But, what about the bottom line? Are you sure about the source?


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.