Republican Jewish Coalition Spends Big Against Sestak

By
Tuesday, October 19, 2010 at 3:27 pm

Fresh off some heartening poll numbers for Rep. Joe Sestak (D-Pa.) in his Senate race, the Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) had announced that it will launch a major ad campaign tomorrow in the Philadelphia area, spending over $1 million attacking the congressman over his record on Israel.

The RJC has taken a strong interest in the Pennsylvania race. It attacked Sestak earlier in the campaign following an endorsement he received from former Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.), another figure the group considers to be dangerously anti-Israel. Its new ad points out that Sestak said he would support the trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammad in a Pennsylvania civilian court and paints the idea as irresponsible.

Going after Sestak on national security issues seems unlikely to make a big dent in his support. The man is a retired three-star admiral who worked in counterintelligence for years. Yet the added million dollars’ worth of negative air time in an area he needs to win by a wide margin is a sizable sum that will counterbalance the cash-on-hand advantage that Sestak improbably enjoys over former Rep. Pat Toomey.

Another interesting storyline to monitor will be to see what additional moves, if any, Toomey’s old friends at the Club for Growth will make on his behalf in the final weeks of the campaign.

Follow Jesse Zwick on Twitter


Comments

5 Comments

Tweets that mention Republican Jewish Coalition Spends Big Against Sestak « The Washington Independent -- Topsy.com
Pingback posted October 19, 2010 @ 3:48 pm

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Chael Montgomery, r3publican and Shannon Grow-Garrett, WashIndependent. WashIndependent said: Republican Jewish Coalition Spends Big Against Sestak http://bit.ly/bFenll [...]


aahpat
Comment posted October 20, 2010 @ 12:59 pm

Pennsylvanians are learning that Toxic Pat Toomey actually helped to CAUSE the financial collapse and we do not want to allow him back in congress to do it again.

Toxic Toomey, on the floor of the House Nov. 4, 1999 defending S-900 that empowered “too big to fail”, expanded use by banks of TOXIC DERIVATIVES and shackled the Community Reinvestment Act that could have mitigated the repeal of Glass-Steagall.

“The repeal of Glass-Steagall is necessary so that consumers can get the products and services they desire and American financial firms can compete in the global marketplace.

Madam Speaker, I would like to highlight just one small part of this sweeping legislation. I am particularly pleased that this bill includes an important provision regarding certain derivative transactions, especially credit and equity swaps. These somewhat obscure products are actually very important tools used by businesses, including financial service firms, to manage a variety of risks that they face. This bill reaffirms that swap contracts are legitimate bank products that can be executed and booked in banks and are adequately regulated by and will continue to be regulated by banking supervisors.”

Other, still sitting, members of congress who actually caused the collapse of the U.S. economy:
The Congress that Collapsed America
http://home.ptd.net/~aahpat/aandc/congcrash.html


World Wide News Flash
Trackback posted October 25, 2010 @ 12:44 am

Republican Jewish Coalition Spends Big Against Sestak « The ……

I found your entry interesting do I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)…


Memx1
Comment posted October 28, 2010 @ 11:28 am

Doesn't Israel need the money being wasted on a campaign more.


Gillice
Comment posted October 28, 2010 @ 11:31 am

by: Dave Johnson | Campaign for America's Future | Report

There are a number of things the public “knows” as we head into the election that are just false. If people elect leaders based on false information, the things those leaders do in office will not be what the public expects or needs.

Here are eight of the biggest myths that are out there:

1) President Obama tripled the deficit.
Reality: Bush's last budget had a $1.416 trillion deficit. Obama's first budget reduced that to $1.29 trillion.

2) President Obama raised taxes, which hurt the economy.
Reality: Obama cut taxes. 40% of the “stimulus” was wasted on tax cuts which only create debt, which is why it was so much less effective than it could have been.

3) President Obama bailed out the banks.
Reality: While many people conflate the “stimulus” with the bank bailouts, the bank bailouts were requested by President Bush and his Treasury Secretary, former Goldman Sachs CEO Henry Paulson. (Paulson also wanted the bailouts to be “non-reviewable by any court or any agency.”) The bailouts passed and began before the 2008 election of President Obama.

4) The stimulus didn't work.
Reality: The stimulus worked, but was not enough. In fact, according to the Congressional Budget Office, the stimulus raised employment by between 1.4 million and 3.3 million jobs.

5) Businesses will hire if they get tax cuts.
Reality: A business hires the right number of employees to meet demand. Having extra cash does not cause a business to hire, but a business that has a demand for what it does will find the money to hire. Businesses want customers, not tax cuts.

6) Health care reform costs $1 trillion.
Reality: The health care reform reduces government deficits by $138 billion.

7) Social Security is a Ponzi scheme, is “going broke,” people live longer, fewer workers per retiree, etc.
Reality: Social Security has run a surplus since it began, has a trust fund in the trillions, is completely sound for at least 25 more years and cannot legally borrow so cannot contribute to the deficit (compare that to the military budget!) Life expectancy is only longer because fewer babies die; people who reach 65 live about the same number of years as they used to.

8) Government spending takes money out of the economy.
Reality: Government is We, the People and the money it spends is on We, the People. Many people do not know that it is government that builds the roads, airports, ports, courts, schools and other things that are the soil in which business thrives. Many people think that all government spending is on “welfare” and “foreign aid” when that is only a small part of the government's budget.

This stuff really matters.

If the public votes in a new Congress because a majority of voters think this one tripled the deficit, and as a result the new people follow the policies that actually tripled the deficit, the country could go broke.

If the public votes in a new Congress that rejects the idea of helping to create demand in the economy because they think it didn't work, then the new Congress could do things that cause a depression.

If the public votes in a new Congress because they think the health care reform will increase the deficit when it is actually projected to reduce the deficit, then the new Congress could repeal health care reform and thereby make the deficit worse. And on it goes.

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.