Utah Lawmakers Question How Immigration Bill Would Fit Into Existing Law

By
Thursday, October 14, 2010 at 11:07 am

In Utah, illegal immigrants can be granted driver’s privilege cards to prove their driving eligibility even if they cannot prove legal residence to get a state-issued driver’s license. But as state Rep. Stephen Sandstrom (R) pushes for an immigration enforcement law requiring police to verify immigration status “upon reasonable suspicion the person is an illegal immigrant,” lawmakers question how the law can coexist with driver’s privilege cards that would automatically provide reason for officers to suspect illegal status.

At a meeting with the Utah Republican Hispanic Assembly Wednesday, Sandstrom discussed the potential conflict between the bill and a 2005 law creating diver’s privilege cards. “You show a driving-privilege card, that could pretty much shows reasonable suspicion that you are here illegally,” Sandstrom said, according to the Salt Lake Tribune. “I don’t know how to fix that.”

Sandstrom did issue one proposal for resolving the issue: removing the driver’s privilege card altogether. But proponents of the law and immigrant rights groups argue removing the driver’s privilege card — or causing illegal immigrants to fear they would betray illegal status under a Sandstrom’s immigration bill — could have a negative impact on public safety. Immigration lawyers have argued the law could deter illegal immigrants from obtaining the cards, which could mean more unlicensed and uninsured drivers on Utah’s roads.

Follow Elise Foley on Twitter


Comments

13 Comments

Fur Elise (Metal Ringtone Mix) | Costume Wigs
Pingback posted October 14, 2010 @ 11:20 am

[...] Utah Lawmakers Question How Immigration Bill Would Fit Into … [...]


Tweets that mention Utah Lawmakers Question How Immigration Bill Would Fit Into Existing Law « The Washington Independent -- Topsy.com
Pingback posted October 14, 2010 @ 11:29 am

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Elise Foley, WashIndependent. WashIndependent said: Utah Lawmakers Question How Immigration Bill Would Fit Into Existing Law http://bit.ly/cd3c8v [...]


Q&A: Which criminal justice book would you read? | Best Criminal Books
Pingback posted October 14, 2010 @ 12:42 pm

[...] Utah Lawmakers Question How Immigration Bill Would Fit Into … [...]


Utah Lawmakers Question How Immigration Bill Would Fit Into …
Pingback posted October 14, 2010 @ 1:14 pm

[...] by on October 14, 2010 Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.Powered by WP Greet Box Stephen Sandstrom (R) pushes for an immigration enforcement law requiring police to verify immigration status “upon reasonable suspicion the person is an illegal immigrant,” lawmakers question how the law can coexist with driver’s … Here is the original post: Utah Lawmakers Question How Immigration Bill Would Fit Into … [...]


Women Which Man Would You Rather Date And Men What man would you rather b? | Best Humor Books
Pingback posted October 14, 2010 @ 1:42 pm

[...] Utah Lawmakers Question How Immigration Bill Would Fit Into … [...]


Internet Home Based Business Opportunity – What You Need To Know To Succeed | Driving Traffic to Your Success
Pingback posted October 14, 2010 @ 8:18 pm

[...] Utah Lawmakers Question How Immigration Bill Would Fit Into … [...]


Commentators in Football Gambling On Games? | hand bag shopping
Pingback posted October 14, 2010 @ 8:32 pm

[...] Utah Lawmakers Question How Immigration Bill Would Fit Into Existing Law « The Washington Inde… [...]


Utah Lawmakers Question How Immigration Bill Would Fit Into … « Cool Immigration
Pingback posted October 15, 2010 @ 3:23 am

[...] here to read the rest: Utah Lawmakers Question How Immigration Bill Would Fit Into … Comments [...]


Finding an Attorney You Can Trust » Blog Archive » Why does not the Attorney General Holder and other people read the Arizona law? About illegal immigrants?
Pingback posted October 15, 2010 @ 5:10 am

[...] Utah Lawmakers Question How Immigration Bill Would Fit Into Existing Law « The Washington Inde… [...]


stevo1
Comment posted October 15, 2010 @ 11:56 am

Our Government, has allowed the invasion of 30 million criminals in direct violation of Article IV, Section IV of our Constitution. they force American tax payers to pay Billions to provide Welfare, Prison cells, Educate the invaders children, free medical care,massive document fraud, & are destroying our schools, hospitals, communities, culture while Robbing, Raping, Killing & Assaulting American Citizens WAKE UP PEOPLE!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsH8xvjTAlo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Btj6IeOFkis&feature=player_embedded
http://immigrationcounters.com/
http://www.ojjpac.org/memorial.asp
http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/
http://www.newswithviews.com/Wooldridge/frosty580.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8upCLpPlV0&feature=player_embedded

Every Non-representative including obama and holder need to be IMPEACHED! for not upholding the oath of office they swore to defend the Constitution! If these clowns were to do their job, this would all be a Moot point!


World Spinner
Trackback posted October 16, 2010 @ 12:40 am

Utah Lawmakers Question How Immigration Bill Would Fit Into ……

Here at World Spinner we are debating the same thing……


Police: Man ran meth lab in Montco home | Debt Settlement
Pingback posted October 19, 2010 @ 2:12 pm

[...] Utah Lawmakers Question How Immigration Bill Would Fit Into Existing Law « The Washington Inde… [...]


Windy Clover
Comment posted May 26, 2011 @ 7:11 am

Time can test whether the new bill work.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.