Wednesday, May 16th, 2012

Rhetoric Around U.S. Chamber and Foreign Funding Reaches New Heights

By
Monday, October 11, 2010 at 8:59 am

Mudslinging about undisclosed campaign donors and the potential for foreign interference reached a new pitch yesterday in an already surprisingly heated national debate about campaign finance.

President Obama, building off his comments from last week, again didn’t shy away from alluding to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other conservative groups affiliated with Karl Rove when he spoke at a campaign rally on Sunday:

President Obama, speaking at a rally in Philadelphia, said “the American people deserve to know who is trying to sway their elections” and raised the possibility that foreigners could be funding his opponents.

“You don’t know,” Obama said at the rally for Senate candidate Joe Sestak and other Democrats. “It could be the oil industry. It could even be foreign-owned corporations. You don’t know because they don’t have to disclose.”
Obama adviser David Axelrod, meanwhile, pressed the Chamber on CBS’s “Face The Nation” to disclose its donors and put the whole issue to rest, arguing, “If the Chamber opens up its books and says, ‘Here’s where our political money’s coming from,’ then we’ll know. But until they do that, all we have is their assertion.” And the DNC even got in on the action, cutting a new ad that says:
Karl Rove, Ed Gillespie: They’re Bush cronies. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce: They’re shills for big business. And they’re stealing our democracy. Spending millions from secret donors to elect Republicans to do their bidding in Congress. It appears they’ve even taken secret foreign money to influence our elections. It’s incredible: Republicans benefiting from secret foreign money. Tell the Bush crowd and the Chamber of Commerce: Stop stealing our democracy.

Rove and Gillespe, for their part, fought back on the Sunday shows. “Don’t accuse those who are playing by the rules of somehow doing something that is unethical or illegal,” Gillespie argued on “Face the Nation,” while Rove called Obama’s rhetoric a “desperate political ploy.”

Indeed, while the problem of campaign contributions to groups like the Chamber going undisclosed is real, the recent line of attack by Democrats does possess a “Rove-ean” feel. There’s no more evidence that the group collects foreign contributions for campaign spending than there is that any other Section 501(c) nonprofit with opaque accounting processes does, but the White House has grasped — correctly, it seems — that the threat of foreign influence appears more dangerous and exotic to the average American than the more mundane (yet clearly much larger) threat of outsize influence in the political process from Big Business.

Follow Jesse Zwick on Twitter


Categories & Tags: Elections 2010| Politics| | | | | | | | | | | | |

Comments

11 Comments

Obama Scales Back Campaign Finance Criticism After Claims Decried as ‘Baseless’ – FOXNews « Contacto Latino News
Pingback posted October 11, 2010 @ 9:17 am

[...] after GOP strategists warned Democrats against telling "baseless" lies to … Rhetoric Around US Chamber and Foreign Funding Reaches New Heights The Washington [...]

InDenver.com - Obama Scales Back Campaign Finance Criticism After Claims Decried as ‘Baseless’ – FOXNews
Pingback posted October 11, 2010 @ 9:35 am

[...] after GOP strategists warned Democrats against telling "baseless" lies to …Rhetoric Around US Chamber and Foreign Funding Reaches New HeightsThe Washington IndependentPro-Obama and Republicans talk of 'stealing democracy' and [...]

Obama Scales Back Campaign Finance Criticism After Claims Decried as ‘Baseless’ – FOXNews | FinanceLogger.com
Pingback posted October 11, 2010 @ 9:51 am

[...] of whether anybody is violating US law by …Chamber financing attacks continueWashington TimesRhetoric Around US Chamber and Foreign Funding Reaches New HeightsThe Washington IndependentThe Soros Web and the Spiders WithinAmerican Thinkerall 2,225 news [...]

Obama Scales Back Campaign Finance Criticism After Claims Decried as ‘Baseless’ – FOXNews | FinanceGrind.com
Pingback posted October 11, 2010 @ 10:26 am

[...] of whether anybody is violating US law by …Chamber financing attacks continueWashington TimesRhetoric Around US Chamber and Foreign Funding Reaches New HeightsThe Washington IndependentThe Soros Web and the Spiders WithinAmerican ThinkerPolitics Dailyall [...]

Obama Scales Back Campaign Finance Criticism After Claims Decried as ‘Baseless’ – FOXNews | BabbleFinance.com
Pingback posted October 11, 2010 @ 10:32 am

[...] of whether anybody is violating US law by …Chamber financing attacks continueWashington TimesRhetoric Around US Chamber and Foreign Funding Reaches New HeightsThe Washington IndependentThe Soros Web and the Spiders WithinAmerican ThinkerPolitics Dailyall [...]

Teaching Jobs around the World | Cash Backee
Pingback posted October 11, 2010 @ 12:58 pm

[...] Rhetoric Around U.S. Chamber and Foreign Funding Reaches New … [...]

Democrats’ desperation tactics on campaign finance – Washington Post | BabbleFinance.com
Pingback posted October 11, 2010 @ 1:40 pm

[...] of Commerce: Perfectly ConsistentCato @ LibertyChamber financing attacks continueWashington TimesThe Washington Independent -American Thinkerall 2,240 news [...]

Democrats’ desperation tactics on campaign finance – Washington Post | FinanceGrind.com
Pingback posted October 11, 2010 @ 2:08 pm

[...] of Commerce: Perfectly ConsistentCato @ LibertyChamber financing attacks continueWashington TimesThe Washington Independent -Portfolio.com (blog) -American Thinkerall 2,265 news [...]

Jhnjmetal
Comment posted October 11, 2010 @ 1:18 pm

We absolutely MUST know who's funding the evil US Chamber of Commerce; never mind who's funding the Ground Zero Mosque.
Never thought we'd have a full-blown traitor for a president. Guess I was wrong.

Let's send this Alinsky disciple back to Lefty-Land University where he belongs.

Goldie
Comment posted October 11, 2010 @ 4:03 pm

find out who's funding the Mosque if you want, but the chamber has admitted to collecting funds from foreign entities. If it is fungible moneys and allows expenditures here to support candidates, then even indirectly foreign entities are funding our elections. Doesn't that even bother you. Cut the traitor stuff. You sound irrational.

facebook123
Trackback posted September 6, 2011 @ 6:09 pm

Sources…

[...]check below, are some totally unrelated websites to ours, however, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[...]……

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.